MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Experimental Research on Heat Transfer Performance of Honeycomb Heat Regenerator

2009· article· en· W2170935997 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xin-sheng Zhang Xinsheng, Li-hong Xiong, Xitang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in natural science/Advances in natural sciences · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiative Heat Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegenerative heat exchangerHeat transferMaterials scienceHoneycombCombustionCeramicHoneycomb structureNuclear engineeringThermodynamicsComposite materialMechanical engineeringHeat exchangerEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heat transfer characteristics of honeycomb ceramic regenerator has been examined experimentally. The influence of switching time, flow rate of air and fuel gas on temperature distribution under unsteady heat transfer process in regenerator has been investigated. The results obtained are of some reference value for application of high temperature air combustion (HTAC). Key words: honeycomb ceramic regenerator, heat transfer, HTAC technology, molten steel container

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.006
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in natural science/Advances in natural sciencesSame topicRadiative Heat Transfer StudiesFrench-language works237,207