Relaxed half-stochastic decoding of LDPC codes over GF(q)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The error-correcting performance of non-binary LDPC codes has been shown to be better than most codes currently used for a variety of applications. However, due to the very high complexity of decoding these codes, they are not ubiquitously used. Moreover, an SPA decoder is so prohibitively complex, that a fully parallel implementation is not feasible even with simplified algorithms. In this paper we present a new algorithm which approaches the low complexity of stochastic decoding with the high performance of SPA decoding by combining elements from both algorithms and applying successive relaxation. We study its performance using a number of codes and show that it matches that of the SPA. We also analyze its complexity compared to the SPA and conclude that it has lower per iteration complexity and can have comparable average complexity per codeword. Due to the lower per iteration complexity, RHS has the potential of being implemented as a parallel, or partially parallel, decoder that is faster than a feasible SPA decoder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".