MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2170959418 · doi:10.1109/tsa.2003.814411

Quantization of lsf parameters using a trellis modeling

2003· article· en· W2170959418 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrellis quantizationVector quantizationAlgorithmQuantization (signal processing)Speech recognitionMathematicsComputer scienceTrellis (graph)Speech codingDecoding methodsArtificial intelligenceImage processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An efficient block-based trellis quantization (BTQ) scheme is proposed for the quantization of the line spectral frequencies (LSF) in speech coding applications. The scheme is based on the modeling of the LSF intraframe dependencies with a trellis structure. The ordering property and the fact that LSF parameters are bounded within a range is explicitly incorporated in the trellis model. BTQ search and design algorithms are discussed and an efficient algorithm for the index generation (finding the index of a path in the trellis) is presented. Also the sequential vector decorrelation technique is presented to effectively exploit the intraframe correlation of LSF parameters within the trellis. Based on the proposed block-based trellis quantizer, two intraframe schemes and one interframe scheme are proposed. Comparisons to the split-VQ, the trellis coded quantization of LSF parameters, and the multi-stage VQ, as well as the interframe scheme used in IS-641 EFRC and the GSM AMR codec are provided. These results demonstrate that the proposed BTQ schemes outperform the above systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it