<i>Chlamydia pneumoniae</i> Stimulates Proliferation of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Through Induction of Endogenous Heat Shock Protein 60
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chlamydia pneumoniae infection has been linked with atherosclerosis. However, the mechanism responsible for the atherogenic effects of C pneumoniae remains unclear. Heat shock proteins (HSPs) have been found in atherosclerotic lesions. HSPs of HSP70 and HSP90 families are involved in the regulation of cell cycle progression and cell proliferation. We assessed the hypothesis that HSP60 is induced in vascular cells infected with C pneumoniae and stimulates cell proliferation. Rabbit vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were infected with C pneumoniae. Western blot analysis demonstrated the induction of endogenous HSP60 expression in C pneumoniae-infected VSMCs. C pneumoniae infection significantly increased the number of VSMCs, and the mitogenic effect correlated with the expression level of endogenous HSP60. In contrast to VSMCs, C pneumoniae infection had no effect on the expression level of HSP60 and did not stimulate cell proliferation in HUVECs. Exogenous addition of recombinant chlamydial HSP60 had no mitogenic effect on VSMCs and HUVECs. However, overexpression of HSP60 within VSMCs by infection with adenovirus encoding human HSP60 resulted in a significant increase in cell numbers compared with uninfected VSMCs. These results suggest that overexpression of endogenous HSP60 may be a central intracellular event responsible for the mitogenic effects induced by C pneumoniae infection. In addition to C pneumoniae, other infectious agents and atherogenic risk factors may also stimulate VSMC proliferation and contribute to the lesion formation through the induction of HSP60.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".