Autonomous adaptive exploration using realtime online spatiotemporal topic modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The exploration of dangerous environments such as underwater coral reefs and shipwrecks is a difficult and potentially life-threatening task for humans, which naturally makes the use of an autonomous robotic system very appealing. This paper presents such an autonomous system, which is capable of autonomous exploration, and shows its use in a series of experiments to collect image data in challenging underwater marine environments. We present novel contributions on three fronts. First, we present an online topic-modeling-based technique to describe what is being observed using a low-dimensional semantic descriptor. This descriptor attempts to be invariant to observations of different corals belonging to the same species, or observations of similar types of rocks observed from different viewpoints. Second, we use the topic descriptor to compute the surprise score of the current observation. This is done by maintaining an online summary of observations thus far, and then computing the surprise score as the distance of the current observation from the summary in the topic space. Finally, we present a novel control strategy for an underwater robot that allows for intelligent traversal, hovering over surprising observations, and swimming quickly over previously seen corals and rocks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".