MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171039850 · doi:10.1109/tap.2012.2194655

A Simple Leaky-Wave Analysis of 1-D Grooved Metal Structure for Enhanced Microwave Radiation

2012· article· en· W2171039850 on OpenAlexaff
Adrian Sutinjo, M. Okoniewski

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrowaveSimple (philosophy)Electromagnetic radiationRadiationMaterials scienceOpticsOptoelectronicsPhysicsComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a simple analytical solution for a one dimensional grooved structure which, when placed concentrically around or flanking a small aperture, has been shown to enhance microwave radiation from it. We will show that the transcendental equation which describes the grooved structure reduces to a transverse resonance condition at the slot openings. For some parameters, the solution to the problem manifests as a complex wave. We demonstrate that this complex wave indeed well approximates the field distribution when a single aperture is excited for frequencies where the enhancement is most significant. In addition, we propose a simple and intuitive design procedure for the grooved structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207