Simulation of mobile crane operations in 3D space
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 3D model allows users to visualize the construction process during a given period of the schedule. This paper presents a methodology to aid practitioners in preparing lift studies with crane selection, positioning, and lift optimization using a 3D space. The 3D visualization helps to identify collision free paths and optimize lifting activities based on optimal crane paths with cycle time and speed of each crane activity from simulation models in Simphony. The proposed methodology provides to help lifting engineering and project manager select the best possible crane. A case study-based approach is utilized to illustrate the proposed methodology. The case study involves construction of a four story, sixty-eight unit building for older adults in Westlock, AB, Canada. The 3D visualization model was provided for the construction team more than two months before the scheduled day of lifting, which assisted the contractor in selecting the optimum crane and successfully completing all lifts (thirty modules, 25 tons each) in just two working days.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it