Effects of human pregnancy on the ventilatory chemoreflex response to carbon dioxide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined the effects of human pregnancy on the central chemoreflex control of breathing. Subjects were two groups (n=11) of pregnant subjects (PG, gestational age, 36.5+/-0.4 wk) and nonpregnant control subjects (CG), equated for mean age, body height, prepregnant body mass, parity, and aerobic fitness. All subjects performed a hyperoxic CO2 rebreathing procedure, which includes prior hyperventilation and maintenance of iso-oxia. Resting blood gases and plasma progesterone and estradiol concentrations were measured. During rebreathing trials, end-tidal Pco2 increased, whereas end-tidal Po2 was maintained at a constant hyperoxic level. The point at which ventilation (Ve) began to rise as end-tidal Pco2 increased was identified as the central chemoreflex ventilatory recruitment threshold for CO2 (VRTco2). Ve levels below (basal Ve) and above (central chemoreflex sensitivity) the VRTco2 were determined. The VRTco2 was significantly lower in the PG vs. CG (40.5+/-0.8 vs. 45.8+/-1.6 Torr), and both basal Ve (14.8+/-1.1 vs. 9.3+/-1.6 l/min) and central chemoreflex sensitivity (5.07+/-0.74 vs. 3.16+/-0.29 l.min-1.Torr-1) were significantly higher in the PG vs. CG. Pooled data from the two groups showed significant correlations for resting arterial Pco2 with basal Ve, central chemoreflex sensitivity, and the VRTco2. The VRTco2 was also correlated with progesterone and estradiol concentrations. These data support the hypothesis that pregnancy decreases the threshold and increases the sensitivity of the central chemoreflex response to CO2. These changes may be due to the effects of gestational hormones on chemoreflex and/or nonchemoreflex drives to breathe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".