MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171127416 · doi:10.1117/12.390394

<title>Study and test of a hybrid coronagraph</title>

2000· article· en· W2171127416 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pierre Baudoz, Yves Rabbia, Jean Gay

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInnovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCoronagraphAchromatic lensPhysicsOpticsInterferometryTelescopeWavelengthAstronomyExoplanetPlanet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on variations around the technique of Achromatic Interfero Coronagraph (AIC). The AIC is an imaging device providing nulling of a star without nulling the environment of this star. This instrument already shows its capabilities with observations at Observatoire de Haute Provence and Canada France Hawaii Telescope. The main drawback of the AIC is the two symmetrical images it gives on the detector for a given feature. This characteristic is not annoying for compact features such as faint companions, blobs, ... but can be confusing for diluted features. We propose a method to suppress the symmetry of the output image of the AIC. As the AIC, the hybrid coronagraph we proposed is based on a Michelson interferometer with an image plane in one arm. A mask is placed in this image plane to cover the whole plane except the central part of the Airy disk. The hybrid coronagraph is then very close to the phase mask in the concept but since the interferences of the 2 arms are still destructive, it is less wavelength dependent. The only remaining dependency due to the mask diameter versus the wavelength can be largely decreased by an appropriate width for the mask. We eventually outlined first laboratory results with a hybrid coronagraph prototype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207