MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2171157997

The clinical presentation of paediatric narcolepsy in one Canadian sleep centre

2012· article· en· W2171157997 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrea Riekstins, Glenda N. Bendiak, Shelly K. Weiss, Indra Narang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarcolepsyCataplexyMedicineExcessive daytime sleepinessPediatricsFeelingDemographicsSleep disorderPresentation (obstetrics)Medical recordPsychiatryModafinilInsomniaInternal medicinePsychologySurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Narcolepsy is primarily characterized by an overwhelming feeling of sleepiness with or without cataplexy. More recently, there has been a dramatic increase in newly diagnosed childhood narcolepsy and it is hypothesized that H1N1 may play a role in these new cases. The objective of this study is to review the demographics and presenting symptoms of children with narcolepsy in Toronto. Methods: At the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, we reviewed medical records and polysomnograms of patients with narcolepsy who presented to the sleep disorders clinic. All patients were referred with a history of excessive daytime sleepiness. Results: View this table: Conclusion: All patients had excessive daytime sleepiness. Interestingly over half of these young patients had cataplexy on presentation. H1N1 vaccination was not given to the majority of these patients. More research is needed to understand the recent increase in the prevalence of childhood narcolepsy with cataplexy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSleep and Wakefulness Research→French-language works237,207→