MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171169840 · doi:10.3141/2003-03

Dynamic Choice Model of Urban Commercial Activity Patterns of Vehicles and People

2007· article· en· W2171169840 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRIPS architectureTravel surveyScheduleConsistency (knowledge bases)Transport engineeringDuration (music)MicrosimulationMode choiceProcess (computing)Travel behaviorComputer scienceWork (physics)TrainOperations researchEstimationSurvey data collectionDiscrete choiceEngineeringPublic transportGeographyStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intraurban commercial vehicle travel is a relatively underdeveloped aspect of urban travel demand modeling despite the large share of the weekday traffic stream represented by commercial movements. One problem is the proprietary nature of these data and the corresponding lack of behavioral understanding of how establishments schedule their trips. Even when such data have been made available, such as through establishment travel surveys, the large variation in firm size, commodities and services, and logistics practices makes it difficult to create a generalized decision framework. This work uses establishment survey data collected by the Ohio Department of Transportation to create an intraurban commercial vehicle model to be run in a disaggregate microsimulation environment and focuses on commercial movement patterns. The model generates entire daily patterns for workers who regularly travel as part of their jobs and creates tours through a dynamic choice process that incrementally builds tours, taking into consideration elapsed time and time of day in next-stop purpose and location choices. Activity durations are embedded in the utility equations of “stay” alternatives and provide internal consistency between the dimensions of activity purpose, duration, time of day, and location. Model formulation and estimation results are presented for the dynamic activity choice model component. The model system can reproduce observed commercial travel patterns found in the survey data and provide intuitively plausible interpretations for commercial travel behavior in the absence of more detailed knowledge of individual and firm operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it