Locomotor morphometry of the <i>Pachydactylus</i> radiation of lizards (Gekkota: Gekkonidae): a phylogenetically and ecologically informed analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Pachydactylus radiation comprises a diverse group of African gekkonids that exploit a variety of microhabitats and exhibit both climbing and terrestrial locomotion. The phylogeny of this radiation is well supported, making it a promising candidate for the investigation of relationships between limb proportions, ecology, and behaviour. Skeletal and external measurements were recorded for an array of taxa and analyzed using principal components analysis (PCA). The results of the PCAs were further analyzed using phylogenetic statistical methods to ascertain whether climbing and terrestrial species and (or) clades within the radiation differed significantly from each other in limb proportions. Phylogenetically based comparisons revealed that although there is some differentiation between climbing and terrestrial species, this is not a general pattern but is primarily attributable to certain species and clades within the radiation that differ considerably from other members of the group. The results indicate that Chondrodactylus angulifer Peters, 1870 possesses shortened distal phalanges and that Pachydactylus rangei (Andersson, 1908), P. austeni Hewitt, 1923, and the Rhoptropus clade (particularly R. afer Peters, 1869) possess elongated limbs relative to the rest of the radiation. These differences correlate with aspects of the lifestyles of these species, such as increased terrestriality, a reduction or loss of the subdigital adhesive apparatus, digging behaviour, and a transition to diurnality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".