MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171189131 · doi:10.1109/ist.2006.1650770

Comparative Study of Adaptive Segmentation Techniques for Gesture Analysis in Unconstrained Environments

2006· article· en· W2171189131 on OpenAlexafffund
Martin Côté, Pierre Payeur, Gilles Comeau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGait Recognition and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsGestureComputer scienceSegmentationContext (archaeology)Artificial intelligenceGesture recognitionQuality (philosophy)Machine learningHuman–computer interactionComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the importance of providing non- invasive techniques in the analysis of the complex movements performed by musicians and athletes. Current gesture analysis systems are insufficient and do not succeed in providing quality performance measurements without imposing strict environmental and operational constraints on individuals. Computer vision offers the means with which such techniques can be made possible without impeding the performance of musicians or compromising the integrity of the measurements. The following study compares some of the modern image segmentation techniques and discusses their shortcomings with respect to the stated context. A novel statistical method is also introduced in an attempt to improve the resilience of vision-based gesture segmentation. I. INTRODUCTION With the advent of more powerful computing facilities and advances in artificial intelligence, few techniques have been proposed in the evaluation of the complex movements inherent in the performances of musicians and athletes. Such techniques are highly desirable in order to detect problematic situations which often lead to chronic injuries and to provide the capacity with which professors and trainers may measure the evolution and habits of individuals. Gesture analysis provides the means with which quantitative measurements may be obtained with respect to the physical performances of musicians and athletes. Modern gesture analysis methodologies employed by professionals fail to obtain an exhaustive evaluation or a complete comparison between gestures. Current techniques in this type of analysis are not robust enough to operate in the unconstrained environments in which these performances must be evaluated. Many techniques today still rely on the use of encumbering sensor technologies and require the use of cabling or attaching markers on an individual. The techniques also often require a very controlled environment and involve tedious, expensive and complex operating methodologies. The imposed environments are usually foreign to the musicians or athletes resulting in an impeded performance and corruption to the exactitude of the measurements. The undertaken study aims to research and develop new vision-based methodologies suitable for the analysis of musician gestures. Specifically the context being explored consists of analyzing the gestures and postures of pianists with applications to piano pedagogy. Computer vision techniques offer the ideal means for this type of evaluation. Due to their non-invasive nature they do not interfere with the performance of pianists. Computer vision techniques are put to the test in a context where the imposed constraints on the environment and individuals must remain minimal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGait Recognition and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207