MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171220164 · doi:10.1039/c3ta14209d

Highly sensitive and selective fluorescence turn-on detection of lead ion in water using fluorene-based compound and polymer

2014· article· en· W2171220164 on OpenAlexafffund
Sukanta Kumar Saha, Khama Rani Ghosh, Wenhui Hao, Zhi Yuan Wang, Jianjun Ma, Yasser Chiniforooshan, Wojtek J. Bock

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Chemistry A · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular Sensors and Ion Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsRoyal Society of ChemistryRoyal Society
KeywordsFluoreneFluorophoreFluorescencePolymerAqueous solutionChemistryPhotochemistryIonMaterials scienceCombinatorial chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fluorene-based sensory compound and polymers were designed and synthesized for the fluorescence turn-on detection of lead ions in aqueous media. The fluorene unit is used as a fluorophore and also as the building block for making a conjugated fluorene-based polymer. A dicarboxylate pseudo crown was selected as a receptor, which is highly selective towards the lead ion and imparts a good water-solubility to sensory compounds and polymers. The water-soluble sensory compound and fluorene-based polymer show high sensitivity and selectivity towards lead ions in aqueous media. Sensory compound 7a and polymer P2 are highly selective and sensitive for the fluorescence turn-on detection of lead ions in water with a concentration of 4 μM. Fibre-optic sensing for lead ions in water using sensory compound 7a has also been demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials Chemistry ASame topicMolecular Sensors and Ion DetectionFrench-language works237,207