Crystal structure and mutagenesis analysis of chitinase CrChi1 from the nematophagous fungus Clonostachys rosea in complex with the inhibitor caffeine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chitinases are a group of enzymes capable of hydrolysing the β-(1,4)-glycosidic bonds of chitin, an essential component of the fungal cell wall, the shells of nematode eggs, and arthropod exoskeletons. Chitinases from pathogenic fungi have been shown to be putative virulence factors, and can play important roles in infecting hosts. However, very limited information is available on the structure of chitinases from nematophagous fungi. Here, we present the 1.8 Å resolution of the first structure of a Family 18 chitinase from this group of fungi, that of Clonostachys rosea CrChi1, and the 1.6 Å resolution of CrChi1 in complex with a potent inhibitor, caffeine. Like other Family 18 chitinases, CrChi1 has the DXDXE motif at the end of strand β5, with Glu174 as the catalytic residue in the middle of the open end of the (β/α)(8) barrel. Two caffeine molecules were shown to bind to CrChi1 in subsites -1 to +1 in the substrate-binding domain. Moreover, site-directed mutagenesis of the amino acid residues forming hydrogen bonds with caffeine molecules suggests that these residues are important for substrate binding and the hydrolytic process. Our results provide a foundation for elucidating the catalytic mechanism of chitinases from nematophagous fungi and for improving the pathogenicity of nematophagous fungi against agricultural pest hosts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".