MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171272986 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2010.2045568

A CMOS Broadband Low-Noise Mixer With Noise Cancellation

2010· article· en· W2171272986 on OpenAlexaff
Stanley S. K. Ho, Carlos E. Saavedra

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise figureIntermodulationNoise (video)Frequency mixerNoise temperatureCMOSElectronic mixerBroadbandEffective input noise temperatureElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringFlicker noiseLow-noise amplifierNoise measurementActive noise controlNoise reductionEngineeringRadio frequencyPhysicsTelecommunicationsPhase noiseHarmonic mixerComputer scienceAcousticsAmplifierChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a broadband low-noise mixer in CMOS 0.13-¿m technology that operates between 1-5.5 GHz. The mixer has a Gilbert cell configuration that employs broadband low-noise transconductors designed using the noise-cancelling technique used in low-noise amplifer designs. This method allows broadband input matching and without the use of inductors that are frequently required in low-noise mixer designs. The current-bleeding technique is also used so that a high conversion gain can be achieved. Measured results show excellent noise and gain performance across the frequency span with an average double-sideband noise figure of 3.9 dB and a conversion gain of 17.5 dB. It has a third-order intermodulation intercept point of + 0.84 dBm at 5 GHz and it is also very compact with the size of the mixer core only being 0.315 mm2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207