Achromatic plumage reflectance predicts reproductive success in male black-capped chickadees
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The size of achromatic (black, white, gray) plumage patches serves as a male status signal in many species of birds, but variation in the colors of these patches has received little attention. We assessed the relation between achromatic plumage reflectance, dominance rank, body condition, and reproductive success in male black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus. We measured plumage reflectance for five body regions of 40 male chickadees in late winter and monitored these males throughout the following breeding season to determine whether they survived to breed, whether they successfully paired, whether their partner laid eggs, and both their apparent and realized reproductive success. As expected from past studies, a male's dominance rank significantly predicted whether his partner laid eggs. However, only achromatic plumage reflectance significantly predicted other measures of male reproductive performance. Among males who fledged at least one offspring, both the brightness of white plumage regions and the UV-chroma of melanin-based plumage regions were significant predictors of the proportion of within-pair young in their nests. When we consider all males we measured, assigning zero values to males who failed to sire any offspring, the UV-chroma of melanin-based plumage regions was a significant predictor of realized reproductive success. Bib size was also related to male realized reproductive success. Our findings suggest that individual variation in achromatic plumage may play an important role in sexual signaling in chickadees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it