Women living with chronic illness experienced transition that involved stages of distress and a quest for ordinariness
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kralik D. The quest for ordinariness: transition experienced by midlife women living with chronic illness. J Adv Nurs2002 ; 39 : 146 –54 [OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] QUESTION: What is the meaning of living with chronic illness for midlife women? A feminist participatory research design. No fixed setting because of data collection method (email and letter writing). 81 women aged 30–50 years (mean age 44 y) who identified themselves as living with adult onset chronic illness. Women were from Australia, New Zealand, Samoa, North America, and the United Kingdom. Through email and letter writing spanning 12 months, women told their stories about their experiences of living with chronic illness. The frequency of correspondence varied at the discretion of each participant. Correspondence data from participants were thematically analysed. A subset of engaged participants was actively involved in developing constructs and themes by offering validation, clarification, and interpretation. 2 major themes emerged: extraordinariness , which represented the phase of turmoil and distress … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DJournal%2Bof%2Badvanced%2Bnursing%26rft.stitle%253DJ%2BAdv%2BNurs%26rft.aulast%253DKralik%26rft.auinit1%253DD.%26rft.volume%253D39%26rft.issue%253D2%26rft.spage%253D146%26rft.epage%253D154%26rft.atitle%253DThe%2Bquest%2Bfor%2Bordinariness%253A%2Btransition%2Bexperienced%2Bby%2Bmidlife%2Bwomen%2Bliving%2Bwith%2Bchronic%2Billness.%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1046%252Fj.1365-2648.2000.02254.x%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F12100658%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.02254.x&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=12100658&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febnurs%2F6%2F2%2F63.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000176526300010&link_type=ISI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it