MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171328485 · doi:10.1109/pesc.2004.1355128

A new sliding mode like control method for buck converter

2004· article· en· W2171328485 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2004 IEEE 35th Annual Power Electronics Specialists Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37551) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Sliding mode controlBuck converterConvertersComputer scienceSteady state (chemistry)Controller (irrigation)Robust controlFuzzy logicFrequency domainFuzzy control systemMode (computer interface)Variable structure controlControl systemEngineeringControl (management)VoltageNonlinear systemPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sliding mode control is a robust control method with guaranteed large signal stability and good dynamic response. Despite its advantages, sliding mode control for DC-DC converters suffers from non-zero steady state error and variable switching frequency that depends on the converter parameters. This paper proposes a simple sliding mode like control (SMLC) technique for the buck converter that has a fixed switching frequency and zero steady state error. The response of this controller is robust and can be defined directly in the time domain. In addition, fuzzy logic implementation of the proposed SMLC is provided. Experimental results show that the proposed SMLC has good first-order dynamic performance and no steady state error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it