MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171343370 · doi:10.1109/wimob.2006.1696370

Profile-based energy minimisation strategy for Object Tracking Wireless Sensor Networks

2006· article· en· W2171343370 on OpenAlexaff
Óscar García, Alejandro Quintero, Samuel Pierre

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkComputer scienceEnergy consumptionPredictabilityReal-time computingPower consumptionVideo trackingKey distribution in wireless sensor networksObject (grammar)Efficient energy useEnergy (signal processing)WirelessComputer networkDistributed computingPower (physics)Wireless networkArtificial intelligenceEngineeringTelecommunicationsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are composed of power-restrained nodes that limit their lifetime, since the sources of energy are often non-replaceable. In this work, we deal with the power consumption problem in one application of WSNs: objects tracking in a monitored region. Different protocols have been proposed to minimize the energy consumption in such environments. Most of them are based in prediction techniques to know in advance the locations of the object, taking advantage of this information to switch off the sensor nodes as much as possible. However, little work has been done to utilize regularity in the object's behavior to reduce energy consumption. In this paper we propose a profile-based algorithm (PBA) that aims to use the information contained in the network and in the object itself to optimize energy consumption, thus extending lifetime. Simulations show that this method outperforms prediction-based strategies for a wide range of predictability values

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207