MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171344569 · doi:10.5430/jbgc.v2n2p97

Endometrial stromal sarcoma of the uterus with malignant thrombosis of the iliac and femoral veins: Case report and review of literature

2012· article· en· W2171344569 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Priyadarshini Tiwari, Arvind Lele, Rajni Vishnoi, Nishin Jain

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Graphics and Computing · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineParametriumEndometrial stromal sarcomaHemipelvectomyHysterectomySurgeryIliac fossaAbdomenRadiologyExternal iliac veinUterusPelvisSarcomaVeinCervixCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A case report of endometrial stromal sarcoma is presented. A 37 year old patient was admitted with a history of excessive bleeding per vaginum during menstruation and lump in abdomen for the past 6-7 months which was found to be about 24 weeks pregnancy size. On opening the abdomen for hysterectomy the uterus showed a growth extending into the left adnexa, sigmoid mesocolon, and left parametrium. During surgery there was accidental transection of the left ureter and external iliac vein which showed extensive thrombus. As total hysterectomy was not possible, subtotal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed, with D-J stenting of the ureter and ligation of the external iliac vein. Postoperatively the diagnosis of thrombosis of the internal iliac, external iliac, femoral and popliteal veins was established by CT scan and Doppler imaging. Histopathology showed endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical Graphics and ComputingSame topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207