MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171428665 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.081502

Cuscuton and low-energy limit of Hořava-Lifshitz gravity

2009· article· en· W2171428665 on OpenAlexaff
Niayesh Afshordi

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLimit (mathematics)Mathematical physicsPhysicsMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ho\ifmmode \check{r}\else \v{r}\fi{}ava-Lifshitz theory has been recently put forth as a proposal for a renormalizable theory of quantum gravity [1]. It explicitly breaks Lorentz invariance, introducing an apparent extra scalar degree of freedom. I show that the low energy limit of (non-projectible) Ho\ifmmode \check{r}\else \v{r}\fi{}ava-Lifshitz gravity is uniquely given by the quadratic cuscuton model: a covariant scalar field theory with an infinite speed of sound and a quadratic potential, minimally coupled to Einstein gravity. This implies that the extra scalar is nondynamical to all orders in perturbation theory. Cosmological constraints on the quadratic cuscuton model constrain the low energy Lorentz breaking parameter of Ho\ifmmode \check{r}\else \v{r}\fi{}ava-Lifshitz theory to $|\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{-}1|<0.014$. We also point out that the spatial hypersurfaces are constant mean curvature or uniform expansion surfaces and introduce geometrical symmetries that can protect the nondynamical nature of these theories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations124
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmologySame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207