Sarcomeric actin organization is synergistically promoted by tropomodulin, ADF/cofilin, AIP1 and profilin in <i>C. elegans</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sarcomeric organization of thin and thick filaments in striated muscle is important for the efficient generation of contractile forces. Sarcomeric actin filaments are uniform in their lengths and regularly arranged in a striated pattern. Tropomodulin caps the pointed end of actin filaments and is a crucial regulator of sarcomere assembly. Here, we report unexpected synergistic functions of tropomodulin with enhancers of actin filament dynamics in Caenorhabditis elegans striated muscle. Pointed-end capping by tropomodulin inhibited actin filament depolymerization by ADF/cofilin in vitro. However, in vivo, the depletion of tropomodulin strongly enhanced the disorganization of sarcomeric actin filaments in ADF/cofilin mutants, rather than antagonistically suppressing the phenotype. Similar phenotypic enhancements by tropomodulin depletion were also observed in mutant backgrounds for AIP1 and profilin. These in vivo effects cannot be simply explained by antagonistic effects of tropomodulin and ADF/cofilin in vitro. Thus, we propose a model in which tropomodulin and enhancers of actin dynamics synergistically regulate elongation and shortening of actin filaments at the pointed end.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".