MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171461191 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1999.807979

Computer modelling of solid state laser systems

2003· article· en· W2171461191 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSolid State Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCollimated lightLaserOpticsActive laser mediumBeam (structure)RadiationLaser beam qualityPulse (music)Transverse planePhysicsAmplifierLaser power scalingEngineeringOptoelectronicsLaser beams

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A computer modelling program has been developed to model the extraction of an ideal 4-level laser system based on the equations of Franz and Nodvik (1963) with the capability of handling realistic temporal shapes of the pump pulse and various overlap geometries of the pump and laser radiation. Two different simulation programs are used to account for different laser pumping geometries. A cylindrical geometry is used for axial pumping, and a Cartesian geometry is used for transverse pumping. In both cases, the laser beams and gain medium are divided into smaller radial and axial zones according to the geometry in use. Absorption of the pump radiation and amplification of output radiation is calculated separately for each cell of the gain medium. Overlap fractions are used to determine the amount of energy from the pump and extraction beams which are present in a particular gain zone. The simulation algorithm calculates absorption and amplification within the gain region for each time step then propagates the laser and pump radiation forward one time step. The fraction of spontaneous emission that propagates along with the laser beam is also amplified but accounted for separately from the laser beam for amplifier systems. The simulation program calculates the spatial and temporal profile of the output pulse energy and accompanying ASE. The geometry assumes collimated or diverging wavefronts for the laser radiation with different beam radii for different passes to allow simulation of expanding beam or unstable resonator geometries. Currently the modelling code is being used to simulate oscillation and short pulse amplification in Ti:sapphire crystals. Initial comparisons with published experimental results show close agreement with the simulation. The ultimate goal will be to model the performance of multistage short pulse amplifier systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSolid State Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207