MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171464230 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2003.808798

Soft-decision multistage multiuser interference cancellation

2003· article· en· W2171464230 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle antenna interference cancellationClipper (electronics)Computer scienceInterference (communication)Propagation of uncertaintyMultiuser detectionCode division multiple accessSpread spectrumAlgorithmElectronic engineeringBit error rateTelecommunicationsEngineeringDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Successive interference cancellation (SIC) refers to a family of low-complexity multiuser detection methods for direct-sequence code-division multiple-access systems. The performance of multistage SIC depends on the decision function used in the interference cancellation iterations, e.g., hard, soft, or linear decision functions. Due to error propagation, multistage SIC with hard data bit decisions may perform more poorly than multistage SIC with linear or soft decision functions. We propose and analyze a family of generalized unit-clipper bit decision functions that better combine linear and hard decisions. Performance within 0.4 dB of the single-user bound can be obtained. We then make robust the above soft-decision SIC to time-delay errors as large as half a PN chip and evaluate its performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it