MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171467677 · doi:10.1002/chem.201406646

π‐Extended Indenofluorenes

2015· article· en· W2171467677 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Rajeswara Rao, Antonin Desmecht, Dmitrii F. Perepichka

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAnthraceneStructural isomerNaphthaleneChemistryRegioselectivityIntramolecular forceCyclic voltammetryRing (chemistry)Absorption (acoustics)Absorption spectroscopySteric effectsPhotochemistryQuantum yieldMaterials scienceStereochemistryPhysical chemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistryFluorescenceElectrodePhysicsElectrochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of π-extended aromatic indenofluorene (IF) analogues with naphthalene and anthracene cores have been synthesized through acid-catalyzed intramolecular cyclization. The regioselectivity of the reaction is controlled by a combination of steric and electronic factors and in some cases several possible regioisomers have resulted from the same precursor. The effects of ring connectivity on the optoelectronic properties were investigated by DFT calculations, absorption/emission spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and spectroelectrochemical studies. All regioisomers exhibited a redshift of their absorption/emission bands relative to the parent IF analogues, but the magnitude of this shift and other optoelectronic properties (luminescence quantum yield, etc.) depends on the ring connectivity in a less obvious manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicOrganic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207