MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171509726 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2005.1464726

Improved Voice Activity Detection via Contextual Information and Noise Suppression

2005· article· en· W2171509726 on OpenAlexaff
A. Sangwan, Wei‐Ping Zhu, M. Omair Ahmad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoice activity detectionComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Speech recognitionFrame (networking)DetectorNoise (video)Scheme (mathematics)Speech processingArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we develop a contextual voice activity detection (VAD) scheme which combines both contextual and frame specific information to improve detection. Unlike many VAD algorithms which assume that the cues to activity lie within the frame alone, our scheme seeks information for activity in the current as well as the neighboring frames. The new approach provides good robustness in low SNR when the speech frame is corrupted and an alternate reliable source of activity information is necessary. Further, we present a simple noise suppression scheme to enhance the VAD performance at low SNR. The noise suppressor provides spectrally reshaped signal to the VAD. Finally, we combine the contextual VAD and the noise suppression scheme with a basic detector to form a comprehensive VAD. The proposed comprehensive VAD system is tested on speech samples from the SWITCHBOARD database. Various noises under different SNRs are added to the speech signals. Experimental results show that the proposed VAD outperforms the standard algorithm ETSI AMR VAD-1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207