MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171515232 · doi:10.1139/p04-025

Penetration of spheres into loose granular media

2004· article· en· W2171515232 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSPHERESPhysicsPenetration (warfare)Newtonian fluidMechanicsScalingMomentum (technical analysis)ProjectileViscosityPenetration depthClassical mechanicsThermodynamicsOpticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the penetration of steel spheres dropped vertically into a container of loosely packed, small glass beads. We find that the penetration depth of the spheres increases linearly with the incident momentum of the projectile, but with a zero-momentum intercept that can be either positive or negative. This behavior can be understood by modelling the granular medium as a non-Newtonian fluid with a yield stress and an effective viscosity. We derive the scaling behavior of the viscosity and find agreement with our experimental results. PACS Nos.: 45.70.–n, 83.80.Fg, 47.50.+d

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it