MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171523554 · doi:10.7202/024815ar

« Puissance baroque » dans les nouveaux médias. À propos de Prospero’s Books de Peter Greenaway

2007· article· fr· W2171523554 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Walter Moser

Bibliographic record

VenueCinémas Revue d études cinématographiques · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaroqueHumanitiesArtArt historyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans une situation de crise historique, la culture baroque a développé une remarquable puissance esthétique, souvent instrumentalisée par des projets de retotalisation politique. Partant de l'hypothèse que nos nouveaux médias permettent aux artistes contemporains de mieux réaliser la puissance esthétique du baroque qu'on ne l'a fait à l'époque baroque même, on doit se demander ce qu'il en est de la retotalisation aujourd'hui. Dans le film Prospero's Books, Peter Greenaway intègre les deux moments du baroque dans le même ouvrage. L'analyse proposée ici articule la complexe relation entre sa dimension « interartielle » (le film se réfère à la littérature comme à son modèle) et sa dimension intermédiale (l'audiovisuel filmique prend en charge et interroge les médias du langage : oralité, écriture, imprimé).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCinémas Revue d études cinématographiquesSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207