MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2171577804 · doi:10.1139/p02-144

Strain and temperature dependence of crack populations in columnar-grain ice

2003· article· en· W2171577804 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
L. W. Gold

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsStrain rateComposite materialStress intensity factorGrain boundaryMaterials scienceIsotropyTransgranular fractureStress (linguistics)Intergranular corrosionGrowth rateGrain sizePhysicsFracture mechanicsIntergranular fractureMicrostructureGeometryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been shown that the development of grain-boundary and transgranular crack populations in transverse isotropic columnar-grain ice by a uniaxial compressive stress is a random process. The lognormal distribution function was found to be a good descriptor of the strain dependence of the crack density and of the crack length. It is shown, in the present paper, that the populations are induced in the first 10–2 strain and within the time range for the anelastic strain. These time and strain limits, and the strain-rate, stress, temperature, and grain-size dependence of the characteristics of the crack populations, indicate a two-stage process involving the development of precursors and the formation of cracks. The increasing probability for the formation of grain-boundary cracks with increasing strain rate is consistent with a time-dependent growth of voids and an increase in the associated stress intensity factors. The increasing probability for the formation of transgranular cracks with decreasing stain rate is consistent with an increasing density of dislocations and grain distortion due to shear. PACS Nos.: 62.20MK, 62.40-x

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→