MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171583598 · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2008.927110

Privacy Protected Surveillance Using Secure Visual Object Coding

2008· article· en· W2171583598 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncryptionComputer scienceMultiple encryption40-bit encryptionSet partitioning in hierarchical treesProbabilistic encryptionOverhead (engineering)Coding (social sciences)Object (grammar)On-the-fly encryptionFilesystem-level encryptionComputer visionTheoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer securityWaveletWavelet transformMathematicsDiscrete wavelet transform

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<para xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> This paper presents the Secure Shape and Texture SPIHT (SecST-SPIHT) scheme for secure coding of arbitrarily shaped visual objects. The scheme can be employed in a privacy protected surveillance system, whereby visual objects are encrypted so that the content is only available to authorized personnel with the correct decryption key. The secure visual object coder employs shape and texture set partitioning in hierarchical trees (ST-SPIHT) along with a novel selective encryption scheme for efficient, secure storage and transmission of visual object shape and textures. The encryption is performed in the compressed domain and does not affect the rate-distortion performance of the coder. A separate parameter for each encrypted object controls the strength of the encryption versus required processing overhead. Security analyses are provided, demonstrating the confidentiality of both the encrypted and unencrypted portions of the secured output bit-stream, effectively securing the entire object shape and texture content. Experimental results showed that no object details are revealed to attackers who do not possess the correct decryption key. Using typical parameter values and output bit-rates, the SecST-SPIHT coder is shown to require encryption on less than 5% of the output bit-stream, a significant reduction in computational overhead compared to “whole content” encryption schemes. </para>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it