MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171608061 · doi:10.1109/22.920145

Time-domain wavelet Galerkin modeling of two-dimensional electrically large dielectric waveguides

2001· article· en· W2171608061 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscretizationGalerkin methodFinite-difference time-domain methodTime domainWaveletDielectricMathematical analysisFinite difference methodDispersion (optics)ScalingOpticsMathematicsMaterials sciencePhysicsFinite element methodComputer scienceGeometryOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The time-domain wavelet-Galerkin method based on Daubechies' compactly supported scaling functions of high regularity has been applied to the analysis of two-dimensional dielectric slab waveguides that have typical dimensions and material parameters of optical integrated waveguide components, and the results are compared with those obtained with the conventional finite-difference time-domain method. It has been found that the proposed method allows discretization with a much coarser grid than the conventional time-domain analysis techniques due to its local sampling and highly linear numerical dispersion properties. A series of numerical experiments demonstrates the capability of the method to simulate the wave propagation of electrically large inhomogeneous media with reduced computational expenditure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it