MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171646582 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2012.6426009

An electrochemical model-based particle filter approach for Lithium-ion battery estimation

2012· article· en· W2171646582 on OpenAlexaff
M. Foad Samadi, Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Alavi, Mehrdad Saif

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WindsorConcordia UniversitySimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattery (electricity)State of healthParticle filterState of chargeComputer scienceLithium-ion batteryNonlinear systemAutomotive engineeringEngineeringKalman filterPower (physics)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithium-ion batteries are currently amongst the leading technologies for electrical energy storage. In automotive industry they are recognized as the most promising alternative to gasoline powered engines. State estimation of the state of the battery can provide useful information regarding the state of charge (SOC) and state of health (SOH) of the battery which play a crucial role in optimal and safe utilization of the battery. Although the electrochemical dynamics of the battery are described by nonlinear system of PDAEs, most works in the area of condition monitoring of the battery resort to empirical or equivalent electrical circuit models. These models don't provide any physical insight into the battery and lack insight into physical limitations of the battery. This work presents a particle filter algorithm for state estimation and condition monitoring of the Li-ion battery. This filter can effectively deal with the nonlinear and complex nature of the PDAEs describing the dynamics of the battery. It provides accurate estimation of the average as well as spatial distribution of concentration in the battery. The simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed estimation algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207