Founder von Willebrand factor haplotype associated with type 1 von Willebrand disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To date, no dominant mutation has been identified in a significant proportion of patients with type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD). In this study, we examined 70 families as part of the Canadian Type 1 VWD Study. The entire VWF gene was sequenced for 1 index case, revealing 2 sequence variations: intron 30 (5312-19A>C) and exon 28 at Tyr1584Cys (4751A>G). The Tyr1584Cys variation was identified in 14.3% (10 of 70) of the families and was in phase with the 5312-19A>C variation in 7 (10.0%) families. Both variants were observed in 2 of 10 UK families with type 1 VWD, but neither variant was found in 200 and 100 healthy, unrelated persons, respectively. Mean von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo), and factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) for the index cases in these families are 0.4 U/mL, 0.36 U/mL, and 0.54 U/mL, respectively, and VWF multimer patterns show no qualitative abnormalities. Aberrant VWF splicing was not observed in these patients, and both alleles of the VWF gene are expressed as RNA. Molecular dynamic simulation was performed on a homology model of the VWF-A2 domain containing the Tyr1584Cys mutation. This showed that no significant structural changes occur as a result of the substitution but that a new solvent-exposed reactive thiol group is apparent. Expression studies revealed that the Tyr1584Cys mutation results in increased intracellular retention of the VWF protein. We demonstrate that all the families with the Tyr1584Cys mutation share a common, evolved VWF haplotype, suggesting that this mutation is ancient. This is the first report of a mutation that segregates in a significant proportion of patients with type 1 VWD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".