MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171690875 · doi:10.2514/6.2006-6076

Optimal Guidance Using Density-Proportional Flightpath Angle Profile for Precision Landing on Mars

2006· article· en· W2171690875 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Dynamics and Control
Canadian institutionsNGC Aerospace (Canada)Université de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMars Exploration ProgramAtmospheric entryRobustness (evolution)AerodynamicsTrajectoryControllabilityAerospace engineeringControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceAngle of attackSimulationEngineeringPhysicsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the most significant sources of landing dispersion for an autonomously guided vehicle during its atmospheric entry on Mars. Trajectory guidance strategies are to be developed in order to achieve desired terminal altitude, velocity and downrange. Recent advances in the literature showed an analytical predictor-corrector guidance solution using one or two constant flightpath angle segments. However, these algorithms demonstrate some robustness limitations from the inherent vehicle aerodynamic controllability. Therefore, a novel guidance scheme using a density-proportional flightpath angle trajectory profile is proposed in order to improve the guidance performance. Finally, the performance of the algorithm is demonstrated on atmospheric entry simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it