MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171697043 · doi:10.1115/icone16-48630

Flow-Accelerated Corrosion Susceptibility Prediction of Recirculating Steam Generator Internals

2008· article· en· W2171697043 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 1: Plant Operations, Maintenance, Installations and Life Cycle; Component Reliability and Materials Issues; Advanced Applications of Nuclear Technology; Codes, Standards, Licensing and Regulatory Issues · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear Engineering Thermal-Hydraulics
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoiler (water heating)Boiler feedwaterCorrosionFeedwater heaterBoiler blowdownPipingNuclear engineeringChemistryDegradation (telecommunications)TurbulenceFlow (mathematics)Process engineeringMaterials scienceMechanicsWaste managementMechanical engineeringSteam drumMetallurgyEngineeringSuperheated steamElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Steam generator (SG) components are subjected to corrosive solutions in turbulent flow. Under such conditions, actual component lifetimes may be significantly reduced from their original design lifetimes. Premature replacement of steam generator components before their expected lifetime can be very expensive. Furthermore, degradation of essential components can reduce the steam generator efficiency, thus reducing net profits. Moreover, a SG failure can also be a safety issue. One of the degradation mechanisms affecting secondary-side SG internal structural elements, which are referred to as internals, is Flow-Accelerated Corrosion (FAC). The susceptibility to FAC depends on flow parameters, water chemistry, and materials. All SG internals made of carbon steel are susceptible to FAC to varying degrees. For FAC susceptibility prediction, flow velocity, pH, and oxygen distributions are needed. SG codes, including THIRST (Thermal Hydraulic analysis In STeam generators, a computer code developed by AECL), traditionally solve for thermalhydraulic parameters. A new chemistry module has been added to THIRST, which now makes this code useful for the prediction of local water chemistry parameters in the SG. The THIRST chemistry module is comprised of a multicomponent, multiphase mass transport model coupled with a multiphase chemical equilibrium model. As input, the module requires amine concentrations in the feedwater and reheater drains. The module predicts local distributions of amine concentration in the secondary side. The concentrations predicted by the module are used to compute the pH. The chemistry module was verified against results of other work in the literature and against station blowdown data. Flow and chemistry predictions of THIRST were used to predict FAC susceptibility for internals of a SG with an integral preheater and a SG without it. Ranking of SG locations in order of FAC susceptibility was estimated from an empirical, Kastner-Riedle model. The most susceptible internals are predicted to be those in the upper section of the hot side and those on the cold side that are near the SG centre, while SG lower regions, including the integral preheater, if one exists, are better protected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it