MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Residual emissions of CFC-11 and CFC-12 in the São Paulo metropolitan area

2006· article· pt· W2171713876 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Luciano Marani, Plínio Carlos Alvalá, V. W. J. H. Kirchhoff

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Journal of Geophysics · 2006
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsMetropolitan areaEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyAtmospheric sciencesClimatologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study of atmospheric chlorofluorocarbons CCl3F (CFC-11) and CCl2F2 (CFC-12) was performed in the Metropolitan Region of São Paulo - MRSP (23.5ºS; 46.6ºW) during 2002. For the quantitative determination of the CFC concentration, a gas chromatograph with electron capture detector (ECD) was optimized with relative precision of 1.0%. In the MRSP, the observations of CFC-12 showed that there are large spatial and temporal variations in their concentrations (540.1 to 1395.8 pptv), while the CFC-11 concentrations did not show any statistically significant variation. Daily samplings were performed in June, July, August, September, November and December and showed that the emissions of CFC-12 were concentrated on weekdays (Monday to Friday), relating the emissions of this gas with its use in air conditioning and refrigeration systems of commercial and industrial buildings. The spatial variation observed in monthly campaigns in MRSP (April, May, June, July, August and September) and their matching with the predominant local wind direction evidencing the existence of a source region of CFC-12, located in the central area of the city. These results are indicative that emissions of CFC-12 are still significant. The monitoring of the mixing ratios of these gases in large cities like São Paulo can add to evaluate how the countries are following the Montreal Protocol, which restricts the production and trading of CFCs in developing countries, and schedule their banishment to 2010.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrazilian Journal of GeophysicsSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207