Performance of concatenated coded IR-UWB in the presence of multiple-access interference
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Impulse-radio ultra-wideband (IR-UWB) transmission has recently become popular for data communications. In the new IEEE 802.15.4 a standard, IR-UWB modulation is mated with a concatenated coding scheme consisting of a Reed-Solomon and a convolutional encoder. While most of the available literature has been dedicated to the study of uncoded IR-UWB transmission, this paper is concerned with the performance analysis for IEEE 802.15.4 a compliant concatenated coded IR-UWB systems. In particular, a semi-analytical error-rate expressions for coherent RAKE detection with suboptimal multipath combining is presented. While first a single-user channel is assumed, in the second part of this paper this analysis is extended to include the effect of IR-UWB multiple access interference. To this end, a Gilbert-Elliot-type Markov interference model is adapted to the IEEE 802.15.4 a modulation format.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".