MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171719174 · doi:10.7451/cbe.2014.56.3.25

Assessment of fan control strategies for in-bin natural air-drying of wheat in Western Canada.

2015· article· en· W2171719174 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Biosystems Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Drying and Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsBinNatural (archaeology)Environmental scienceAgricultural engineeringMathematicsGeographyEngineeringArchaeologyAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grains (common term referring to cereal grains, oilseeds, pulses) are usually harvested at high moisture content and then dried to straight grade (dry) or safe storage moisture levels. Grain drying in freestanding, corrugated galvanized steel or welded steel bins using natural air is the most cost effective drying method with optimum grain quality. Adverse weather conditions and inappropriate fan control strategies may result in poor drying, higher drying cost (electricity and fuel), and grain spoilage. Several traditional fan control (continuous ON, only Day ON, only Night ON) and automated fan control (Natural Air Drying (NAD) and Self-Adapting Variable Heat (SAVH)) strategies were investigated using IntegrisPro model software (OPIsystems Inc.©) for their drying potential for wheat using 30 years of historical weather data (1983-2012) from 14 locations in Western Canada (Alberta, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan provinces) which cover nearly 75% of Canada’s farming area. Effects of initial wheat moistures (20, 18, and 16%), start dates (August 20th, September 1st, September 15th, and October 1st), locations, airflow rates (0.52, 0.78, and, 1.04 m3min-1t-1) and supplemental heat on drying performance were studied. High moisture wheat (18-20%) can only be dried effectively with sufficient airflow rate (0.78, and, 1.04 m3min-1t-1) and early drying start date (September 15th or earlier). Without automated control, Continuous ON fan control was a better control strategy. The SAVH control strategy gave the optimized results in terms of fan run hours, target moisture, moisture spread, and shrink (over-drying). The Night ON fan control strategy gave the poorest drying results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it