MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171743682 · doi:10.1002/anie.200903092

Patterning of Surfaces by Oxidation of Amine‐Containing Compounds Using Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

2009· article· en· W2171743682 on OpenAlexaff
Charles Cougnon, Janine Mauzeroll, Daniel Bélanger

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmine gas treatingDerivatizationElectrochemistryScanning electrochemical microscopyMicropatterningOptical microscopeNanotechnologyDiffusionMicroscopeMicroscopyMaterials scienceChemistryCombinatorial chemistryScanning electron microscopeChemical engineeringComputer scienceOrganic chemistryElectrodeOpticsChromatographyMass spectrometryPhysicsPhysical chemistryEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A micropatterning procedure based on the oxidation of an amine starts with the reduction of a nitro-containing compound at the scanning electrochemical microscope tip (see picture). After diffusion in the interelectrode gap, the amine is oxidized on a gold sample, thus resulting in a local derivatization. This procedure is expected to be suitable for extended microstructuring of surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207