MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171762970 · doi:10.1111/ene.12233

White blood cell count is an independent predictor of outcomes after acute ischaemic stroke

2013· article· en· W2171762970 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Neurology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesToronto Western HospitalToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineConfoundingStroke (engine)White blood cellIschaemic strokeOdds ratioHazard ratioConfidence intervalIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In patients with ischaemic stroke, elevated white blood cell count (WBC) has been associated with stroke severity on admission and poor functional outcome. However, previous studies did not control for confounding factors. We hypothesized that higher WBC is an independent predictor of stroke severity, greater degree of disability and 30-day mortality after acute ischaemic stroke. METHODS: Data from the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network on consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke admitted between July 2003 and March 2008 were used. Patients were divided into groups as follows: low WBC (0.1-4 × 10(-9) /l), normal WBC (4.1-10 × 10(-9) /l) and high WBC (10.1-40 × 10(-9) /l). Primary outcome measures were the frequency of moderate/severe strokes on admission (Canadian Neurological Scale ≤ 8), greater degree of disability at discharge (modified Rankin score 3-6) and 30-day mortality. Regression analyses were performed adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: In total, 8829 patients were included. After adjustment for major potential confounders, every 1 × 10(-9) /l increase in WBC was associated with stroke severity on admission [odds ratio (OR) 1.09; 95%CI 1.07-1.10; P < 0.0001), disability at discharge (OR 1.04; 95%CI 1.02-1.06; P = 0.0005) and 30-day mortality (hazard ratio 1.07; 95%CI 1.05-1.08; P < 0.0001). The Kaplan-Meier curves indicate that elevated WBC is associated with higher mortality after acute ischaemic stroke (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute ischaemic stroke, higher WBC on admission is an independent predictor of stroke severity on admission, greater degree of disability at discharge and 30-day mortality. These results reinforce the need for further studies focused on immunomodulation therapy targeting inflammatory response following acute ischaemic stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it