Le haut représentant, de despote éclairé à repoussoir. Les stratégies locales et la politique de l’intervention internationale en Bosnie-Herzégovine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les ratés qu’a récemment connus la consolidation de la paix en Bosnie-Herzégovine sont attribués à l’immaturité des politiciens, à leur atavisme communiste et à leur électoralisme. Dans cet article, il est estimé que ces comportements politiques correspondent à des stratégies rationnelles s’ils sont remis dans leur contexte. Ce retour à des stratégies d’obstruction y est attribué à l’érosion de l’arrangement informel conclu entre les acteurs locaux et internationaux. En échange de la collaboration des élites nationales aux réformes, l’autorité extérieure agissait jusqu’à récemment comme garde-fou contre les idées radicales et en tant que despote éclairé, évitant aux élus d’assumer les coûts politiques de leurs décisions. Le retrait international hésitant a érodé cet échange de bons procédés et a amené les élites locales à réorganiser leurs stratégies politiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".