MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171821243 · doi:10.1109/08ias.2008.178

Modeling and Minimization of Speed Ripple of a Faulty Induction Motor with Broken Rotor Bars

2008· article· en· W2171821243 on OpenAlexaff
M. Nasir Uddin, W. Wang, Zhi Rui Huang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRippleInduction motorControl theory (sociology)Rotor (electric)Computer scienceMinificationVector controlFault (geology)Digital signal processorConvergence (economics)Electronic speed controlEngineeringDigital signal processingControl (management)Artificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringVoltageComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the modeling and minimization technique for speed ripple of a vector controlled faulty induction motor (FIM) with broken rotor bars. First, the performance of the FIM is investigated in terms of speed ripple under the open-loop condition. Then, a new mechanical model of induction motor is developed incorporating the speed ripple. Based on this model a new NFC is proposed to tolerant the effect of the fault under an indirect field oriented control scheme. The proposed NFC compensates the faulty condition by minimizing the supply frequency related speed ripples instead of directly working on the low frequency signature speed ripples which a FIM exhibits. Based on the knowledge of motor control and intelligent algorithms an unsupervised self-tuning method is developed to adjust weights of the proposed NFC. The convergence of the weights is also discussed and investigated in simulation. The complete drive is experimentally implemented using a digital signal processor board DS-1104 for a laboratory 250 W faulty IM. The effectiveness of the proposed NFC is tested both in simulation and experiment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207