Les associations de bassin versant du littoral acadien : un modèle d’acteurs valorisant les approches écosystémiques et d’économie sociale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de cet article est de mettre en évidence les liens entre la gestion intégrée des ressources en eau et l’approche de l’économie sociale. Cette étude a examiné les retombées positives d’un programme provincial néobrunswickois d’amélioration des systèmes de fosses septiques dirigé par des associations de bassin versant du littoral acadien (sud du golfe Saint-Laurent) entre 2003 et 2007. Tout d’abord, le contexte théorique permet de situer les concepts de gestion par bassin versant, de gestion intégrée des ressources en eau et d’économie sociale. Par la suite, une analyse des perceptions des retombées environnementales, économiques et sociales résultant de l’administration du programme provincial est effectuée grâce à une recherche partenariale participative, des entrevues et des groupes de discussion. Les conclusions de cette étude mettent en valeur la contribution de ces associations à l’économie sociale, au développement durable et à la gestion intégrée au Nouveau-Brunswick.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".