ACE‐FTS measurements across the edge of the winter 2004 Arctic vortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE‐FTS) solar occultation measurements have been used to create volume mixing ratio (VMR) profiles of H2O, CH4, and N2O inside and outside the 2004 Arctic vortex. Using derived meteorological quantities such as potential vorticity, we have classified 450 occultations (from February and March 2004 spanning 0 to 79.8°N) as vortex, vortex edge, or extravortex. We plot [CH4] versus [N2O] correlations to display the distinct patterns observed for measurements of different air masses and use these correlations to further classify the extravortex occultations as tropical, subtropical, or midlatitude. Using comparisons between high latitude profiles of [N2O], [CH4], and [H2O] inside and outside the Arctic vortex, we estimate upper stratospheric and lower mesospheric descent rates and find that descent in the winter 2004 Arctic vortex was rapid, with evidence of descent at higher altitudes than in past years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".