MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171845426 · doi:10.2514/6.2009-5938

New Identification Method Based on Neural Network for Helicopters from Flight Test Data

2009· article· en· W2171845426 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace and Aviation Technology
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlight testIdentification (biology)Artificial neural networkComputer scienceTest (biology)Artificial intelligenceSimulationGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new technique for helicopter model identification from flight data tests is presented. A helicopter model has been identified and validated for 22 flight conditions defined by an altitude varying between 3,000 ft and 6,000 ft, a s peed varying from 30 knots to 110 knots and a helicopter loading with a heavy gross weight and a longitudinal aft or forward center of gravity, and for different pilot commands. The d ynamic behavior of the helicopter was identified with a recurrence method and an optimization procedure based on neural network theory and tuning of the initial conditions . Observation of the model’s output was carried out by three different methods (linear and nonlinear) and a comparison between them was performed. Very good results were obtained in both open- and closed-loop systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it