MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171874199 · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2004.1380898

Fault diagnosis of pneumatic actuator using adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system models and a learning vector quantization neural network

2005· article· en· W2171874199 on OpenAlexaff
Linda Z. Shi, Nariman Sepehri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemLearning vector quantizationArtificial neural networkComputer scienceActuatorControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceNonlinear systemQuantization (signal processing)Control engineeringNeuro-fuzzyFault (geology)Fuzzy logicMachine learningEngineeringFuzzy control systemAlgorithmControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fault diagnosis in pneumatic actuators is a very difficult task due to the inherent high nonlinearity and uncertainty. Developing models of nonlinear systems with adaptive network-based fuzzy inference systems (ANFISs) has recently received attention. Models that are built upon ANFISs overcome the disadvantages of ordinary fuzzy modeling and can be very suitable for generalized modeling of nonlinear plants. We set up a group of ANFIS models which are relatively common in practice, corresponding to various situations of a pneumatic actuator, including normal, low and high supply pressure. Considering the advantage that a learning vector quantization (LVQ) neural network has a powerful ability to classification, we then utilize a LVQ neural network as a fault diagnosis scheme by abstracting the data of ANFIS models as the input vectors for nonlinear plants. The effectiveness is demonstrated via experiments on a pneumatic actuator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207