MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2171910288 · doi:10.1139/e03-074

Lake Terrell upland glacial resurgences and implications for late-glacial history, northwestern Washington State, U.S.A.

2003· article· en· W2171910288 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Dori J. Kovanen, Olav Slaymaker

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGlacial periodDeglaciationMorainePaleontologyRidgeLast Glacial MaximumPost-glacial reboundGeomorphologySedimentPhysical geographyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New geomorphic data from the Lake Terrell uplands along the western margin of the Fraser Lowland in Washington reveal moraines (and (or) a complex grounding zone) and raised marine terraces. A large ridge that almost encircles the upland is asymmetric, and its surface material consists of fine- to coarse-grained diamictons. These ridges are argued to have formed adjacent to an ice margin near the marine limit, where the depositional processes are variable (e.g., ice-rafted rainout, dumping, sediment gravity flow). Multiple crests and crosscutting relations suggest that at least two glacial resurgences occurred during deglaciation of this area. The presence of these features, and their probable extent and stratigraphic position, raise several questions about relative sea-level history and ice margin reconstructions for this area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.951

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences→Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→