A coach-initiated motivational climate intervention and athletes’ perceptions of group cohesion in youth sport.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current study examined the influence of a motivational climate intervention with recreational youth soccer coaches on athletes’ perceptions of group cohesion. Results of a repeated-measures MANOVA demonstrated a significant Time Condition interaction, p .01, p .09, with follow-up univariate tests indicating differences between groups for perceptions of both task, p .02, p .05, and social cohesion, p .01, p .06, across time. In essence, coaches in the motivational climate intervention had athletes who demonstrated elevated perceptions of task and social cohesion by the end-of-season measure (.44 Cohen’s d .49). Overall, results (a) highlight the efficacy of the motivational climate intervention with coaches through increased perceptions of task-focused behaviors, and (b) demonstrate the ability to positively influence perceptions of cohesion in youth sport through a manipulation of basic coaching behaviors. Implications and future directions are offered as they relate to team-building interventions and adherence in a youth sport context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it