MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2171947433 · doi:10.1002/agr.20294

G.A.Alsos, S.Carter, E.Ljunggren, and F.Welter (eds.), The Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship in Agriculture and Rural Development. Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. 320 pp., ISBN: 978 1 84844 635 0, $195 hardcover.

2012· article· en· W2171947433 on OpenAlex
Jennifer Bond, G. D. Graff

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAgribusiness · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCooperative Studies and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingCitationEntrepreneurshipLibrary scienceSociologyManagementPolitical scienceComputer scienceEconomicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sectoral research on entrepreneurship has often focused on manufacturing, high technology, and service industries, with seemingly little attention paid to agriculture.This book remedies the shortfall by bringing together 16 separate studies of various aspects of entrepreneurship in agriculture with an eye for how fluctuations impact rural development.With 46 contributors, it would have been easy for the handbook to lack direction and cohesion.However, the editors have done an admirable job of organizing the text and linking concepts across sections.The use of consistent and clear formatting of the included studies is especially appreciated and contributes to the overall continuity of the book.The Introduction, authored by the volume's editors, provides an overview of the philosophy of the handbook, and convincingly motivates the need for entrepreneurial research focused expressly on agriculture.Specifically, the editors credit increased retailer concentration, policy reforms that have reduced support for agriculture, and the growing complexity of consumer preferences, all as sources of rationale for the observed increase in entrepreneurial activity in agriculture.Broad changes in the sector and attitudes toward entrepreneurship have created numerous research opportunities for economist and rural sociologist alike; however, the editors posit that the two camps are rarely linked despite sharing common research objectives.Indeed, none of the individual studies contained in the volume appear to be jointly authored by economists and rural sociologists.Thus, the bridging of the two disciplines is primarily left for the editors to suggest and the reader to infer from their juxtaposition of individual studies.Despite a lack of interchapter collaboration, an effort is made to organize the book into sections, within which are contributions from both disciplines.The result is, at minimum, an illumination of the similarity of outcomes that can be achieved via application of different social science methodologies.Unlike the theoretically dense Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: Disciplinary Perspectives (Alvarez, Agarwal, & Sorenson, 2005), the chapters in this handbook rely heavily on the case study method, with significantly less emphasis on examination of theoretical underpinnings and cutting-edge statistical methods.Econometricians looking for statistical rigor may want to look elsewhere for methodological guidance.However, applied agricultural economistsparticularly those with an affinity for industrial organization, food policy, agribusiness, and regional economics fields-may find this volume a refreshingly quick read, unencumbered by lengthy discussions of theory, supporting literature, and methods.The chapters are organized according to three themes.The first theme, "Entrepreneurship in the Farming Sector," includes six studies focused on the individual firm or farm or on individual entrepreneurs.The diversity of entrepreneurial activities is explored and differences explained in terms of resource depth and breadth, farmer motivation, and other factors.Probability of entrepreneurial success is found to be enhanced by access to resources; however, chapter 5, by Jorunn Grande, demonstrates that resource richness alone does not guarantee profitability.Rather, she argues, the probability of success is enhanced through the operator's ability to be creative and think strategically about how to deploy resources.Chapter 6, by St-Jean, Le Bel, and Audet, all from Quebec, reviews the case of Eastern Canadian forestry firms where operation size and depth of entrepreneurial potential are found to be positively correlated.Chapter 7, by Pyysiäinen, Halpin, and Vesala, summarizes a study of European farmers' attitudes towards entrepreneurship and finds that, contrary to public perception, survey respondents are amenable to the idea of entrepreneurship and towards self-identification as entrepreneurs.Despite a lack of philosophical resistance towards change and innovation, some farmers feel that entrepreneurial activities are not right for their type of operations.Thus,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it